Wednesday, February 25, 2009

TIME TO REFRAME THE ECO-TERMS

I believe this continual reference to averages is hurting the eco debate.  Few people will react to 1 or 2 degree increase in the average planetary temperature because its not dramatic enough to understand the severity which that represents and also because its still too easy for lay persons and scientists on some polluters payroll to muddy up or dismiss as within a natural set of normal variances.

But I'll bet the extremes of hot and cold and their length are not only greater than they have been in the poles but would better represent the crisis. 

If the temperature spikes or there are more days of above melting temp weather AND the drops are colder than normal or there are more days of severe cold weather then the average wouldn't move much but the impact of the extremes would be devastating.

Anyone who has spent any time in the prairies knows that extremely cold air is unlikely to have snow in it as the crystals need a near 0c temp to form.

Anyone who has spent time in northern California knows that extremely warm air not only eliminates rainfall and speeds up the evaporation of the glaciers but dries out the forests until they're kindling. 

If the poles aren't getting as much snow because the temperature shifts to extreme cold quicker, a temp less likely to have snowfall, and then stays that way longer now; AND the summers are hitting highs or staying warmer longer than they used to then the average temp could still be within norms but the effects from these extremes would be dramatic to say the least.

That's the information that I'd like to see because most Canadians might not relate to "global warming" right now but no one can argue that the weather hasn't been getting more and more extreme more and more often.  And once you frame the discussion so that everyone can relate you’ll get a lot more traction on the issue.

Friday, February 20, 2009

20 things iHATE about MAC


Advertising can turn a lemon into lemonade or make something that really isn't that much different from your product look like junk. It's the reason McDonald's is the Number 1 burger joint in the world despite the crappy food they serve. It's also the reason MAC sales are surging while the nearly identical VISTA failed. Yup, you heard me, VISTA is MAC on a PC.

So why does everyone avoid computers with VISTA loaded? And they do. I know people who bought laptops with Vista and had them retrograded, which is a lot like buying a Mercedes and putting a Hyundai engine in it, then complaining because it doesn’t work right.

Well, a few hard core PC Gamers found VISTA's operating system slowed down their games, which often require 110% of their processing capabilities (you get 110% by spending a fortune on internal cooling systems that clock the processor at speeds well beyond what it’s designed for).

Then the Network Administrators started slagging it because it meant having to learn a whole new set of protocols and that not only meant work for them but it also increased the likelihood they’d miss something critical and get canned.

So once word got out that the Geek Elite was avoiding VISTA it didn't take APPLE long to cap on that and start their infamous "PC vs MAC" ads. After that you could literally see the fat lady warming up.

But here's the big joke to that. Geeks don't buy MACs because it doesn't matter how much you know about computers there’s nothing a series gamer can do to bypass Mac systems and goose the extra speed from it you need for a serious bout of Warcraft.

So the lemmings who bought the message and avoided VISTA were the people it was actually made for. And instead of using a system that was not only cheaper than a Mac but more compatible with 99% of the free world they leapt off the cliffs of doom and plummeted into the Mac Cult where the best thing you can say about your computer is that it looks nice.

But in case you're thinking of buying Mac and are still on the fence let me share just 20 of the big complaints I have with it:

1. PRICE: C'mon, you can get 3 PCs that'll do the same thing for the price of this system, and they actually have programs loaded in them that iNEED.

2. THE APPLE KEY. This is the single most annoying invention in the history of computing. It does the same thing a CONTROL key does on a PC, only it's one key further in on the keyboard which makes finding it without looking almost impossible.

3. THINGS DON'T CLOSE WHEN YOU CLICK X. On a PC the file ends operations when you click the red X, on a MAC it just minimizes and appears to go away but remains. After you forget all about it and you suddenly notice its still active you actually have to go MENU> PROGRAM> CLOSE> YES to get rid of it. Good luck if you're in a hurry.

4. THE DOCK: If you use a MAC you know bloody well what the problems here are. Could this be any less intuitive or more annoying? If you don’t use MAC go into an APPLE STORE and tell the cultists to leave you alone while you play with the “computer”. Open any three applications then minimize them and try to get from one to the next. hehehe

5. PROGRAMS FORCE THEMSELVES TO THE FRONT: Ever opened multiple apps on a PC. You can put them where you want and they'll close in reverse sequence to how you opened them. In MAC there are programs that decide for themselves to go up front SUDDENLY. Even if you want to see something else you can't because the program doing something in the background keeps popping up front. It means you can't touch type on a Mac if you're multitasking because you have no way of knowing which program you'll be typing in.

6. UPGRADING: This is sort of #1 again. A 500 gig PC internal Hard drive costs me $150, a 300 gig MAC internal Hard drive will cost me $750. WHUUUUU???

7. PROGRAMS: Oh sure, if all you're going to do is iLIFE it coz you only want to surf the net, check mail, take photos and listen to music then your overpriced MAC comes fully loaded. If you want to do ANYTHING else the programs costs at least 2x as much as they would for PC - AND THERE AREN'T MANY TO CHOOSE FROM so forget about shopping around. Oh and none of them are free so don't even bother looking.

8. SMALL DIALOGUE BOXES: You'd think for $3000 they could make a dialogue box big enough that you didn't need to squint at to read it. The 9 inch Mac screens went the way of the dinosaur decades ago, pity the programmers haven't realized that yet.

9. CONSISTENCY: Even if a feature is not necessarily intuitive, it’s easier to understand if it works the same way everywhere it’s encountered. Unfortunately, Mac isn’t as consistent as one might expect. For example, if you select a folder as the source for images in Desktop & Screen Saver preferences, it might work in one tab, but not in another.

10. DESKTOP: Why doesn't the pop-up menu near the top have a Fit Screen option that would proportionately stretch or shrink the image to match either the horizontal or the vertical pixel dimensions of the display? Such an option would work equally well with both portrait and landscape pictures, without clipping or aspect ratio distortion. The screen saver already does this by default, so why can’t Desktop?

11. DISAPPEARING SIDEBAR: Menu items should do what they say they will do and not have unintended consequences. Case in point: if you choose View > Hide Toolbar (Option-Command-T), not only does the toolbar disappear but so too does the Sidebar. This isn’t the behaviour described by the menu item, and it's really annoying when the Sidebar disappears unexpectedly.

12. DOESN'T NETWORK WELL: The moment we set things up so that the MAC could transfer files between it and other systems in our house we ran into the unexpected problem of the MAC freezing up on start up if those units were shut off. And it stayed that way until we confirmed that the other computers (which it treats as volumes in it's own system) weren't available. IT DID THIS EVERY SINGLE TIME UNTIL WE TOOK IT OFF THE NETWORK!!

13. ARE YOU SURE?: Okay, this can be a really useful function in a computer. However when your computer doesn't warn you that the unnamed scratch file IS being used by other applications and lets you delete it only to later discovery you've just lost 4 months work that's annoying. Particularly since it insists on warning you about completely harmless operations every single freaking minute of use!

14. THAT MEDIA TYPE IS NOT SUPPORTED: Huh? You know the Mac ad where it brags about being compatible with everything? HA!! I've had media files the Mac created and then like a father who can't handle the responsibility suddenly it completely refuses to recognize the file. It's visible, it just won't open. If I had a Dollar for every file I created in Mac but had to transfer to my PC, change into a compatible Mac file format and then import back into Mac to get onto the next step of what I wanted to do the bloody MAC would have paid for itself!

15. LACK OF HELP ONBOARD: Ever got a file that your PC didn't recognize? Notice how various applications pop up trying to help you find out why, or help you download the driver to make them work? Notice how most of that is free? iPHOTO doesn't do that. After adding a folder full of images into my iPHOTO library I started getting all sorts of dialog boxes telling me "the source files were unreadable because they were in an unrecognized file type". Fair enough, but iPHOTO doesn't offer any assistance to deal with this. Most bloody MAC programs don't. It either works or it doesn't iEXIST! However, the moment I import these into the supposedly more inferior PC I not only get help opening them but have the tools I need to convert them so my idiot MAC can view the bloody things. I've never had an extension I couldn't open in my PC. I might need to download a driver which the PC will not only help me find but install for me, often for free. I've got hundreds of pictures and videos my MAC doesn't even acknowledge and others it'll VIEW ONLY but won't otherwise touch. Bloody useless.

16. PINWHEEL PAUSES: Remember the blue screen of death? How long has it been since you saw that? I'm betting if you bought a PC in the last 5 years operating on XP or better it's been about 5 years. For some reason MAC, the self-proclaimed stability master, freezes up hourly while some mysterious program is working on something. Now, i've got quad processors so it should be able to do 4 things at once. The very least it could do was leave one processor for what I'm working on at the time and let the other 3 handle whatever the background thingy is that requires so much effort, but NOOOOOOOOOO, the whole computer freezes up sapping whatever productivity gains the Mac promised into some void - the same void where this mysterious application is that keeps causing the PINWHEEL OF INFREQUENT BOREDOM to appear.

17. PERMISSIONS: Ever worked on a network in your office? Notice how there are things you can't do because the Administrators have locked those functions out? Imagine now you're using your computer at home and you're the only one who uses it. You are the only user! Now imagine that you're trying to do something but suddenly your Mac says you don't have permission to perform that task. If you're lucky it might ask you to authenticate yourself as an administrator but if not you're screwed. So if you don't have permission to do, who does?

18. EMPTYING THE TRASH: Imagine you are trying to empty the Trash and a dialog box pops up notifying you that "the operation cannot be completed because the item is in use." Fair enough right? You don’t expect Mac OS X to allow you to delete a file that’s actually being used by another application, but apparently it's too much to expect to be told the name of the application or thread that’s laying claim to the document? You know, some info so you could figure out how to free it of the lifeline that's keeping you from flushing the trash!

19. APPLE STORE EMPLOYEES ARE USELESS: So I go into the APPLE STORE and I explain the problem I'm having with my Mac. I've already checked the internet and found lots of references to the problem but no solutions. You know what the APPLE EXPERT SAYS TO ME? "It shouldn't do that." Uh, yeah. I know. That's why I'm here. How do I fix it? “I don’t know, it shouldn’t do that.” Yeah…

20. JUST BECAUSE THE CABLES CONNECT DOESN'T MEAN IT'LL WORK: This is my favourite. I bought the Mac and because the G5 tower I was told I needed costs more than the most expensive PC on the market I opted not to buy the monitor. "No problem!" said the APPLE expert. Any monitor you have will plug in and work. So I got home and sure enough the spare monitor I had came with a cable that fit perfectly into the corresponding MONITOR connector on the Mac. I turned it on and voila it worked perfectly. I set everything up and then clicked the six steps required to shut her down. The Mac shut off and the whirring of the fan came to a halt and then I stood up to go do something else. Suddenly the Mac turned back on. I continued to do this until I decided to put everything on a powerbar I could manually switch off which was how I got the thing to stay off for the first few months. Skip ahead those months and an entirely unrelated problem had me on the Mac Help line. All of a sudden the 3rd techie on the other end asked me what kind of monitor I had. I told him, answered all his questions and then he said, "You can't plug the monitor into the monitor port. You need to get an adaptor and use this other port." Why? Because the monitor port was only for a Mac brand digital monitor and my generic monitor wasn't digital so even though it was compatable and had worked it was confusing the Mac and causing the restart problem. So I went to the APPLE STORE and bought the cheapest cable they had for the problem. It's 3 inches long and costs $50. The monitor only cost me $5. So when an Applenista brags about how universal Macs are, remember the caveat: "Yeah, if you've got the cash for the right adaptors."

So why do I use Mac then? Because someone convinced me it was a better platform to edit video on. I still use it for editing, but at least now I have a PC so I can do real work.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

THE GLOBE & MAIL: WELL WRITTEN/POORLY READ


Today’s rampage comes thanks to two very obtuse Globe & Mail readers who responded to a comment I made about the picture posted with the story of US President Barrack Obama’s visit to Ottawa today.

The pic will be included but what caught me immediately was that the photographer had focused on Obama even though Harper was in the foreground and speaking. It’s a very well taken shot. It also sparked the following comment by me on that story’s COMMENTS page. I know, that was MY first mistake.

AS POSTED:

Simon Proxy, from Canada wrote: I love the pic on the globe homepage for this story as i write this. It's a close up showing Obama, sharply in focus, looking at an out of focus Harper while he stands in the foreground speaking.

It captures my exact feelings about these two leaders. One (Obama) had a clear vision and is focused, the other (Harper) is a large unfocused head with no vision except saving his own neck.

Posted 19/02/09 at 3:26 PM EST

A FEW MINUTES LATER ONE OF THE GLOBE’S MORE OBTUSE POSTERS WROTE:

Paul Byer from Canada quotes: Simon Proxy from Canada writes: I love the pic on the globe homepage for this story as i write this. It's a close up showing Obama, sharply in focus, looking at an out of focus Harper while he stands in the foreground speaking.

It captures my exact feelings about these two leaders. One (Obama) had a clear vision and is focused, the other (Harper) is a large unfocused head with no vision except saving his own neck.

......................................................................................

Your kids obviously take the family photos if you need an explanation.

Posted 19/02/09 at 3:31 PM EST

NOT ONLY DOES THAT NOT MAKE ANY SENSE IT DID MORE TO INSULT THE RESPONDER THAN ME. BUT THEN…

martha stewart from Canada quotes:

Simon Proxy writes: "I love the pic... It captures my exact feelings about these two leaders. One (Obama) had a clear vision and is focused, the other (Harper) is a large unfocused head with no vision except saving his own neck."

AND ADDED: But the newspaper photographer did that.

Posted 19/02/09 at 3:35 PM EST

REALLY MARTHA? IS THAT HOW PICTURES GET INTO NEWSPAPERS? WELL, DUH!! AND YEAH, I GET THE FRAMING AND FOCAL LENGTH WERE DONE BY THE GLOBE PHOTOG. DO I REALLY HAVE TO EXPLAIN "This picture exactly captures my feelings" TO PEOPLE?

LOOK, I HAD TO SAY SOMETHING. THESE TWO IDIOTS ASKED FOR IT BY POSTING SUCH ASSINE STATEMENTS, SO…

Simon Proxy, from Canada wrote: as a longtime reader of the Globe comments i know that many posters here seem to have an inability to comprehend wit, satire, irony, parody and cheek when reading my posts so I'll refrain from adding a figurative slap on the sides of their respective heads for completely missing my point above but i would seriously recommend both put their analysts on danger pay!

Posted 19/02/09 at 3:45 PM EST

IT WOULD APPEAR THAT I OWE HARPER AND THE REFORMERS AN APOLOGY BECAUSE BASED ON SOME GLOBE POSTERS CANADIANS ARE INDEED GEORGE W BUSH STUPID.

GEORGE W BUSH STUPID

Sometimes I can go a few days without wanting to drive up to Ottawa and start the revolution. This is a bigger deal than it seems because right now we have a Reform Prime Minister doing what I’ve always said a Reform PM would do (that is change his opinion daily depending on which way the polling winds are blowing) and an opposition that includes Jack “Will Make Deals With Devils For Relevance” Layton.

Usually the spark that invokes my chronic need to type out another rant for this blog is something in one of Canada’s National Newspapers. Well, that isn’t true obviously, for although the National Post claims to be a National newspaper I never read it for the same reason I gave their phone solicitor when they called up asking if I wanted a FREE subscription, and that is: “If I want my news that biased I’ll get it printed on the drapes”. Typically this is met with a profound silence from the English challenged caller on the other end who I suspect wouldn’t understand sarcasm if a giant sign popped up in front of their face with the words “SARCASM” written on it.

Yesterday however the spark was in the mail. All through the last session of Parliament the Harper Government engaged in a practice that was, if not against the letter of the law, certainly against the spirit of the law regarding Election advertising. That being that a party can’t do any when there isn’t an election. What makes their particular practice worse is that, to circumvent election laws, they use the communication budget each MP is given to perpetrate the crime.

Here’s how it works. Every MP gets a budget to communicate with their constituency. Send out quarterly updates about what’s going on in the House etc. They’re permitted to use this budget to email people in other ridings on issues of national importance in order to help get voters in other ridings to pressure their MPs to support a particular bill or motion. The purpose of this primarily is to help individual MPs get support for Private Member bills or legislation of a particularly personal importance to them. It’s not a very commonly used practice either way because at best its poaching, at worst it’s using tax payers money to influence the opinion of people who can’t even vote for you.

The Harper Reformers do this all the time. Worst still they take the budgeted money set aside in ridings they have no worries about losing, say a Calgary riding that has always voted Reform or Conservative, and instead of spending even a dime to communicate with their own constituents (whom they rightfully take for granted as Alberta is a one-party province) and spend that money blanketing constituents in marginal ridings controlled by the Liberals. Yup, that’s right people of Calgary, tax dollars set aside for your MPs to communicate with you are being wasted on mass junk mailings to places like Brampton and Mississauga!

And that’s where this week’s outrage comes from. They hadn’t done this since the 2008 election. I figured it was because it didn’t work before 2008 and what with the economic collapse and a Harper budget overrun of $67 BILLION DOLLARS that the party might try to be a bit more responsible with the taxpayer’s money. Okay, kick me for wishful thinking.

But the worst part is that the recent mailing is either directed at people the Harperites think are George W Bush stupid, or comes from people who are George W Bush stupid.

The wording on it goes like this: “During this time of global economic challenge, Canadians rightly expect that their government, and all of their elected Members of Parliament in the House of Commons, will focus on the economy. That means that political parties must put aside their differences and, instead, build on their common ground. The Conservative [sic] government believes that, while all elected MPs have a mandate, it is more important than ever for those from our national parties to work together to address the troubles facing Canada’s economy. That way, we can ensure that we are all working towards the same important goal: the continued success of Canada.”

This would be a fine sentiment if the inside of the mailer didn’t list what the Conservatives [sic] are doing followed by a ballot where you can tick the name of the leader: “Who is on the right track to stand up for Canada?” And just to make sure you pick the right one there’s a picture of a puffy, smiling Stephen Harper and an arrow pointing to Harper’s name.

Outside: “Political parties must put aside their differences” vs. inside: “Harper is on the right track, not the others”

Outside: “Build on common ground” vs. inside: “Only one is on the right track and that is Harper.”

Outside: “more important than ever for our national parties to work together” vs. inside: “Only hail Stephen Harper.”

And here’s the biggest kicker. You can clip, tape and return your answer to the Alberta MP listed on the outside NO POSTAGE REQUIRED because correspondence to the House of Commons doesn’t cost you anything directly, it comes out of a parliamentary budget [ie: tax payer’s dollars] and the MP on this mailing? Stephen Harper. Yup, he’s not even trying to camouflage his incessant need for reinforcement, and the Reform controlled Conservative party isn’t the slightest bit concerned with transparency, accountability, being responsible with taxpayer’s money, honesty, integrity, or a spiralling deficit so long as it keeps them in power and the other parties in the cold.

Tell you what. Why don't each of you print out the return mail image above and send it to Harper, if he gets enough of these he won't have any left in his budget to do another one before we turf his ass!

Monday, February 9, 2009

FOOL ME ONCE SHAME ON YOU, FOOL ME TWICE...

Our next election will be very telling indeed. Compared to W Mr Harper didn't look so bad. His policies were the same but he was more articulate. Compared to Obama however he's coming across as the out of touch, overreaching oligarch, Bush clone that he really is.

The Coalition already expedited the replacement of Dion from the Liberal party so it has already been the best thing to happen to Canada in the last 30 years.

And hopefully many of those who couldn't bring themselves to vote for Liberal in the last election and instead choose to support Jack Layton have now seen Mr Layton as the opportunist he really is. Not that that was a surprise, Layton is after all the man who brought down Paul Martin to prop up Stephen Harper!

So the reversal of fortune in the next election should be quite telling indeed and the only province that will protest it is Alberta, the only province in Canada that has had one party rule for more than 30 years straight.

I've never understood how any Albertan could continually justify re-electing the Conservatives to their provincial government, even giving them a majority after the billion dollar Nova scam of the 90's, and again when the taint of the 300 million Peter Pocklington affair reached all the way to the Premier's office, but I don't mean to denigrate the people who did.

And for the people in Alberta who keep voting Conservative regardless of how badly they run things, denigrate means put down.

Friday, February 6, 2009

DO-NOTHING HARPER MUST GO

Mr Harper betrayed everyone who voted Conservative in the last election and all of you remained fooled so long as he gets away with it.

Instead of being the steady hand at the wheel of the Canadian economy and the best to face the growing economic crisis, which was already on the table of discussion during the English language debate when it was manageable, the Prime Minister introduced through his Finance Minister a weak economic statement that was more about partisan posturing than doing anything to help mitigate the economy.

That was NOVEMBER. The crisis that followed was created by Harper himself and then fueled by first his complete failure to simply apologize and correct it, then his neck saving action of proroguing parliament.

While the Conservatives have managed to frame the coalition as a bad thing for Canada the fact is delaying action on the economy for a full 10 weeks while Harper ran another campaign against the opposition did FAR MORE DAMAGE BY INACTION than a bunch of wild monkeys would've.

And this is the point that many people simply refuse to rationally consider. PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING and for the government to abrogate their responsibilities, forcing most Canadians to suffer a Christmas in increased insecurity, while many Canadians were unemployed without jobs to get was beyond irresponsible.

As insane as a Dion/Layton government sounds now any action from that coalition would've been measured and responsible; otherwise it too would've lost the confidence of the majority of the house. AND IT WOULD'VE HAPPENED 80 DAYS EARLIER than "Do Nothing" Harper managed.

Mr Harper has to go. He has lost the confidence of the people of Canada, he did not provide the steady hand at the wheel that he promised. Harper is the reckless cowboy willing to ride the team to the very brink in order to save his own neck.

We NEED a leader who is far more concerned with action than self-preservation. Barrack Obama, who managed to guide US policy BEFORE assuming control did. Harper DIDN'T.